After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 519689 - "Open with"-list does not update when you select a different program
"Open with"-list does not update when you select a different program
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] GIO
2.21.x
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 521994 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-03-01 07:28 UTC by Sebastian Keller
Modified: 2008-03-13 15:51 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22


Description Sebastian Keller 2008-03-01 07:28:47 UTC 
Please describe the problem:
When trying to change the program with which a file should be opened in the "properties->open with" dialog you can click on the different programs, but the radio-button of the originally selected program still gets drawn as selected, while the newly selected one remains unselected. This however does not affect the functionality since when you click on apply the the file gets opened with the newly chosen program.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Rightclick a file, Properties
2. Open With
3. select a program


Actual results:
The list does not update according to the new selection

Expected results:
Mark the newly selected program as selected

Does this happen every time?
Yes

Other information:
Comment 1 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-01 10:48:06 UTC 
-> GIO.

Yes, I can reproduce this. What's strange is that if you click some times, and then close the dialog, and open it again, an application from the list have disappeared, and clicking the radio button to set the default will work fine, also if you manually add again the missing app.
Comment 2 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-12 12:26:30 UTC 
*** Bug 521994 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Sebastien Bacher 2008-03-13 15:51:38 UTC 
the bug is fixed in svn now