GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 518783
crash in Open Folder: open "Open with"
Last modified: 2008-02-26 19:54:06 UTC
Version: 2.20.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? open "Open with" Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.20.3 2008-01-12 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1 System: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 20:20:49 UTC 2008 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 79880192 vsize: 79880192 resident: 22749184 share: 15597568 rss: 22749184 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1204009973 rtime: 315 utime: 295 stime: 20 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb6c956c0 (LWP 18508)] (no debugging symbols found) 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 190469
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6c956c0 (LWP 18508))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- alarm-queue.c:2003 (alarm_queue_add_async) - 0x80c5f30 alarm-notify.c:337 (alarm_msgport_replied) - 0x80bb930: Replied to GUI thread alarm-queue.c:581 (load_alarms_for_today) - From Tue Feb 26 08:13:06 2008 to Tue Feb 26 08:13:06 2008 alarm-queue.c:518 (load_alarms) alarm-queue.c:547 (load_alarms) - Setting Call backs alarm-notify.c:349 (alarm_msg_received) - 0x80c9cf0: Received at thread b5c10b90 alarm-queue.c:2003 (alarm_queue_add_async) - 0x80c1e60 alarm-notify.c:337 (aGot Event! 33, -1 (gnome-panel:18507): Gtk-WARNING **: gtk_widget_size_allocate(): attempt to allocate widget with width -5 and height 24 Got Event! 33, -1 (nautilus:18508): Eel-WARNING **: No extension, not implemented yet --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 355018 ***