GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 516861
crash in Tasks: tried to exit from evolu...
Last modified: 2008-02-17 02:56:32 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? tried to exit from evolution Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-11-13 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.23.15-80.fc7 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 17:29:10 EST 2008 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Permissive Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 144064512 vsize: 144064512 resident: 50118656 share: 32813056 rss: 50118656 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1203178719 rtime: 4012 utime: 2635 stime: 1377 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208817952 (LWP 3998)] [New Thread -1280312432 (LWP 4159)] [New Thread -1301959792 (LWP 4087)] [New Thread -1250952304 (LWP 4007)] [New Thread -1227871344 (LWP 4005)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 189411
Thread 4 (Thread -1250952304 (LWP 4007))
----------- .xsession-errors (86 sec old) --------------------- localuser:nataraj being added to access control list SESSION_MANAGER=local/unix:/tmp/.ICE-unix/3841 ** Message: Could not connect to power manager: Could not get owner of name 'org.gnome.PowerManager': no such name ** Message: Could not connect to power manager: Could not get owner of name 'org.gnome.PowerManager': no such name ** Message: Could not connect to power manager: Could not get owner of name 'org.gnome.PowerManager': no such name --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 339602 ***