GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 516145
crash in Home Folder: Kommando root# df ausgef...
Last modified: 2008-02-13 00:23:42 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? Kommando root# df ausgeführt Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 84115456 vsize: 84115456 resident: 23461888 share: 13074432 rss: 23461888 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1202858993 rtime: 185 utime: 169 stime: 16 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1209149728 (LWP 3008)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x0014f402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 189014
Thread 1 (Thread -1209149728 (LWP 3008))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- ** (nautilus:3008): WARNING **: Possibly invalid new URI 'file:///root# df' This can cause subtle evils like #48423 --- Hash table keys for warning below: --> file:///root (nautilus:3108): Eel-WARNING **: "nautilus-directory.c: directories" hash table still has 1 element at quit time (keys above) (nautilus:3008): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_filename_display_basename: assertion `filename != NULL' failed (nautilus:3008): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_label_set_label: assertion `str != NULL' failed (nautilus:3008): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_filename_display_basename: assertion `filename != NULL' failed (nautilus:3008): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_filename_display_basename: assertion `filename != NULL' failed --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 436071 ***