GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 515557
crash in Gimmie: searching for "synaptinc...
Last modified: 2008-03-10 11:47:10 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? searching for "synaptinc" in the "linux" tab Distribution: Ubuntu 7.10 (gutsy) Gnome Release: 2.20.1 2007-10-19 (Ubuntu) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1 System: Linux 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Dec 18 08:02:57 UTC 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Aurora-Midnight Icon Theme: Crux Memory status: size: 0 vsize: 0 resident: 0 share: 0 rss: 0 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 0 rtime: 0 utime: 0 stime: 0 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0 ----------- .xsession-errors (279 sec old) --------------------- alarm-queue.c:518 (load_alarms) alarm-notify.c:393 (cal_opened_cb) file:///home/lucy/.evolution/tasks/local/system - Calendar Status 0 alarm-queue.c:2052 (alarm_queue_add_client) - Posting a task alarm-queue.c:547 (load_alarms) - Setting Call backs alarm-notify.c:349 (alarm_msg_received) - 0x80ebe90: Received at thread b45bcb90 alarm-queue.c:2003 (alarm_queue_add_async) - 0x80eb540 alarm-notify.c:337 (alarm_msgport_replied) - 0x80e7f80: Replied to GUI thread alarm-queue.c:581 (load_alarms_for_today) - From Sun Feb 10 12:52:31 2008 to Sun Feb 10 12:52:31 2008 alarm-queue.c:518 (load_alarms) alarm-queue.c:547 (load_alarms) - Setting Call backs alarm-notify.c:337 (alarm_msgport_replied) - 0x80ebe90: Replied to GUI thread alarm-notify.c:393 (cal_opened_cb) contacts:/// - Calendar Status 0 alarm-queue.c:2052 (alarm_queue_add_client) - Posting a task alarm-notify.c:349 (alarm_msg_received) - 0x80ebe90: Received -------------------------------------------------- Gimmie Version: 0.2.8 Traceback (most recent call last):
+ Trace 188724
printer.connect("attributes_changed", lambda *args: self.emit("reload"))
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475020 ***