After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 514311 - crash in Tasks: send/receive email.....
crash in Tasks: send/receive email.....
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 364700
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: BugBuddyBugs
2.10.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-02-04 15:08 UTC by dave.damon
Modified: 2008-02-04 17:26 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description dave.damon 2008-02-04 15:08:53 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
send/receive email.....


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-11-13 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.23.14-64.fc7 #1 SMP Sun Jan 20 23:54:08 EST 2008 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 186716160 vsize: 186716160 resident: 54865920 share: 37830656 rss: 54865920 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1202137551 rtime: 802 utime: 656 stime: 146 cutime:0 cstime: 2 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208797472 (LWP 17910)]
[New Thread -1309029488 (LWP 18005)]
[New Thread -1210897520 (LWP 18004)]
[New Thread -1277166704 (LWP 17978)]
[New Thread -1298539632 (LWP 17948)]
[New Thread -1256186992 (LWP 17945)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208797472 (LWP 17910))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 g_main_context_check
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #9 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (48391 sec old) ---------------------
(mail-notification:3282): mail-notification-WARNING **: daved@exchange.hilgraeve.com: unable to start SASL authentication: SASL(-4): no mechanism available: No worthy mechs found
(mail-notification:3282): mail-notification-WARNING **: daved@exchange.hilgraeve.com: unable to start SASL authentication: SASL(-4): no mechanism available: No worthy mechs found
(mail-notification:3282): mail-notification-WARNING **: daved@exchange.hilgraeve.com: unable to start SASL authentication: SASL(-4): no mechanism available: No worthy mechs found
(mail-notification:3282): mail-notification-WARNING **: daved@exchange.hilgraeve.com: unable to start SASL authentication: SASL(-4): no mechanism available: No worthy mechs found
(mail-notification:3282): mail-notification-WARNING **: daved@exchange.hilgraeve.com: unable to start SASL authentication: SASL(-4): no mechanism available: No worthy mechs found
(mail-notification:3282): mail-notification-WARNING **: daved@exchange.hilgraeve.com: unable to start SASL authentication: SASL(-4): no mechanism available: No worthy mechs found
(mail-notification:3282): mail-notification-WARNING **: daved@exchange.hilgraeve.com: unable to start SASL authentication: SASL(-4): no mechanism available: No worthy mechs found
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Tobias Mueller 2008-02-04 17:26:00 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 364700 ***