After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 512671 - crash in Open Folder: This time I stretch an i...
crash in Open Folder: This time I stretch an i...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 511406
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] GIO
2.21.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-01-28 22:09 UTC by nemes.sorin
Modified: 2008-01-29 00:25 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22



Description nemes.sorin 2008-01-28 22:09:30 UTC
Version: 2.21.6

What were you doing when the application crashed?
This time I stretch an icon (of an .png image - so I stretched a thumbnail) and Nautilus crash


Distribution: Ubuntu 8.04 (hardy)
Gnome Release: 2.21.5 2008-01-15 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.24-5-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 24 19:45:21 UTC 2008 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10400090
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Aurora-looks
Icon Theme: nuoveXT.2.2

Memory status: size: 195260416 vsize: 195260416 resident: 86523904 share: 29884416 rss: 86523904 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1201551431 rtime: 11511 utime: 7228 stime: 4283 cutime:0 cstime: 2 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb6a5c6c0 (LWP 10411)]
[New Thread 0xae079b90 (LWP 13074)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xb7ef9410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6a5c6c0 (LWP 10411))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #7 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #12 ??
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
  • #17 g_object_get_qdata
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 strtol
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (1935 sec old) ---------------------
(nautilus:10411): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_utf8_collate: assertion `str1 != NULL' failed
(nautilus:10411): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_utf8_collate: assertion `str1 != NULL' failed
(nautilus:10411): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_utf8_collate: assertion `str1 != NULL' failed
(nautilus:10411): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_utf8_collate: assertion `str2 != NULL' failed
(nautilus:10411): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_utf8_collate: assertion `str1 != NULL' failed
(nautilus:10411): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_utf8_collate: assertion `str1 != NULL' failed
(nautilus:10411): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_utf8_collate: assertion `str1 != NULL' failed
(nautilus:10411): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_utf8_collate: assertion `str1 != NULL' failed
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-01-29 00:23:31 UTC
->GIO

Yes, this is 100% reproducible here.
Attaching a good stacktrace.

Distribution: Gentoo Base System release 2.0.0_rc6-r1
Gnome Release: 2.21.5 2008-01-20 (Gentoo)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.24-rc4-zen1 #2 PREEMPT Fri Dec 28 14:20:56 CET 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10400090
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Enabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 116592640 vsize: 116592640 resident: 50868224 share: 22552576 rss: 50868224 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1201562476 rtime: 855 utime: 794 stime: 61 cutime:6 cstime: 4 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb6ab46d0 (LWP 3890)]
[New Thread 0xb25b5b90 (LWP 22800)]
[New Thread 0xb4f7fb90 (LWP 23942)]
0xb7fb6410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6ab46d0 (LWP 3890))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 IA__g_spawn_sync
    at gspawn.c line 374
  • #3 IA__g_spawn_command_line_sync
    at gspawn.c line 682
  • #4 run_bug_buddy
    at gnome-breakpad.cc line 213
  • #5 check_if_gdb
    at gnome-breakpad.cc line 283
  • #6 google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::InternalWriteMinidump
    at ../google-breakpad/src/client/linux/handler/exception_handler.cc line 225
  • #7 google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::HandleException
    at ../google-breakpad/src/client/linux/handler/exception_handler.cc line 196
  • #8 <signal handler called>
  • #9 *__GI_____strtol_l_internal
    at strtol_l.c line 298
  • #10 *__GI_strtol
    at strtol.c line 110
  • #11 thumbnail_read_callback
    at /usr/include/stdlib.h line 291
  • #12 IA__g_simple_async_result_complete
    at gsimpleasyncresult.c line 553
  • #13 load_contents_close_callback
    at gfile.c line 4709
  • #14 async_ready_close_callback_wrapper
    at ginputstream.c line 487
  • #15 IA__g_simple_async_result_complete
    at gsimpleasyncresult.c line 553
  • #16 complete_in_idle_cb
    at gsimpleasyncresult.c line 563
  • #17 g_idle_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 4142
  • #18 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 2064
  • #19 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2697
  • #20 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2905
  • #21 IA__gtk_main
    at gtkmain.c line 1163
  • #22 main
    at nautilus-main.c line 568
  • #23 __libc_start_main
    at libc-start.c line 227
  • #24 _start
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 2 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-01-29 00:25:24 UTC
Turns out this is a dup of #511406.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 511406 ***