Bug 511842 – crash in Open Folder: looking @ properties of ...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 511842 - crash in Open Folder: looking @ properties of ...


Summary:	crash in Open Folder: looking @ properties of ...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 355018

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.18.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2008-01-24 17:47 UTC by night000vision000
Modified:	2008-01-24 21:10 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.19/2.20

Description night000vision000 2008-01-24 17:47:17 UTC

Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
looking @ properties of mounted pendrive			


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.20.3 2008-01-12 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Nov 4 18:18:09 UTC 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 405573632 vsize: 405573632 resident: 36560896 share: 16621568 rss: 36560896 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1201196780 rtime: 157 utime: 147 stime: 10 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x2af4928b4540 (LWP 23503)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002af48bc3e34f in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 186649

Thread 1 (Thread 0x2af4928b4540 (LWP 23503))

#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 g_spawn_sync
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 g_spawn_command_line_sync
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3 ??
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 strcmp
from /lib/libc.so.6
#6 ??
#7 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_list_store_remove
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_list_store_clear
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 ??
#19 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 nautilus_file_emit_changed
#24 nautilus_directory_emit_change_signals
#25 nautilus_file_changed
#26 ??
#27 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
#28 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 ??
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 main
#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0



----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-01-24 21:10:23 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 355018 ***