After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 510915 - Remove Glib dependency
Remove Glib dependency
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-doc-utils
Classification: Deprecated
Component: build utils
CVS HEAD
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-doc-utils maintainers
gnome-doc-utils maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks: 335239
 
 
Reported: 2008-01-20 23:01 UTC by Marc-Andre Lureau
Modified: 2008-03-21 01:33 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
[1/1] 2008-01-21 Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> (17.61 KB, patch)
2008-01-20 23:04 UTC, Marc-Andre Lureau
committed Details | Review

Description Marc-Andre Lureau 2008-01-20 23:01:23 UTC
There was discussion about circular dependency when gtk-doc will use gnome-doc-utils:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gnome-web-list@gnome.org/msg02344.html

I figured out that the only thing used by gdu is the m4 macros. 
The proposed patch will ship the required macro and hence, rmeove glib depedency.

And then, we can build gtk-doc and publish it on library.gnome.org :)
Comment 1 Marc-Andre Lureau 2008-01-20 23:04:20 UTC
Created attachment 103286 [details] [review]
[1/1] 2008-01-21  Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>


        * Makefile.am, configure.in, m4/glib-gettext.m4:
        Include glib-gettext.m4, using AX_ namespace.
        (Closes #510915)
---
 ChangeLog          |   28 ++--
 Makefile.am        |    2 +-
 configure.in       |    4 +-
 m4/glib-gettext.m4 |  433 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 454 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Comment 2 Marc-Andre Lureau 2008-01-23 14:10:01 UTC
Shaun, what do you think?
Comment 3 Shaun McCance 2008-01-23 16:48:13 UTC
Sounds good to me, although there's a lot of whitespace noise in the ChangeLog diff.  Is it too late in this release cycle for this kind of change?
Comment 4 Marc-Andre Lureau 2008-01-23 18:24:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Sounds good to me, although there's a lot of whitespace noise in the ChangeLog
> diff.  Is it too late in this release cycle for this kind of change?
> 

I don't know. Vuntz should know.
Comment 5 Vincent Untz 2008-01-23 18:48:17 UTC
I see no reason why it would be too late.
Comment 6 Marc-Andre Lureau 2008-03-21 01:33:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Sounds good to me, although there's a lot of whitespace noise in the ChangeLog
> diff.  Is it too late in this release cycle for this kind of change?
> 

A tad late, but the release question should be no more a worry. distcheck just passed, so I applied it in trunk without wspaces changes (grr my .emacs), I guess it was fine. I'll change jhbuild dependency accordingly. yay!