GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 510309
crash in Power Manager: Just after screensaver u...
Last modified: 2008-01-19 22:55:03 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? Just after screensaver unlock Distribution: Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-27 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1 System: Linux 2.6.23.9-85.fc8 #1 SMP Fri Dec 7 15:49:59 EST 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Nodoka Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 45400064 vsize: 45400064 resident: 6807552 share: 5111808 rss: 6807552 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1200341468 rtime: 1028 utime: 882 stime: 146 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-power-manager' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208603984 (LWP 2212)] 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 185769
Thread 1 (Thread -1208603984 (LWP 2212))
----------- .xsession-errors (265045 sec old) --------------------- (evolution:3877): camel-CRITICAL **: get_message_info: assertion `folder->summary != NULL' failed (evolution:3877): camel-CRITICAL **: get_message_info: assertion `folder->summary != NULL' failed (evolution:3877): camel-CRITICAL **: get_message_info: assertion `folder->summary != NULL' failed (evolution:3877): camel-CRITICAL **: get_message_info: assertion `folder->summary != NULL' failed (evolution:3877): camel-CRITICAL **: get_message_info: assertion `folder->summary != NULL' failed (evolution:3877): camel-CRITICAL **: get_message_info: assertion `folder->summary != NULL' failed (evolution:3877): camel-CRITICAL **: get_message_info: assertion `folder->summary != NULL' failed ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 420419 ***