Bug 510264 – crash in File Browser:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 510264 - crash in File Browser:


Summary:	crash in File Browser:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 355018

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.18.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2008-01-17 20:00 UTC by roberto_9085
Modified:	2008-01-18 15:39 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.19/2.20

Description roberto_9085 2008-01-17 20:00:57 UTC

Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.22.3.130307 #1 SMP Sun Jan 13 15:42:25 MST 2008 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Crux
Icon Theme: gartoon

Memory status: size: 409776128 vsize: 409776128 resident: 38195200 share: 16052224 rss: 38195200 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1200593295 rtime: 1119 utime: 1039 stime: 80 cutime:491 cstime: 40 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x2ab88b9b44d0 (LWP 8275)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00000033ee20e34f in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 185746

Thread 1 (Thread 0x2ab88b9b44d0 (LWP 8275))

#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 g_spawn_sync
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 g_spawn_command_line_sync
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3 ??
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 strcmp
from /lib/libc.so.6
#6 ??
#7 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_list_store_remove
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_list_store_clear
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 ??
#19 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 nautilus_file_emit_changed
#24 nautilus_directory_emit_change_signals
#25 nautilus_file_changed
#26 ??
#27 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
#28 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 ??
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 main
#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0



----------- .xsession-errors (97 sec old) ---------------------
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-01-18 15:39:05 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 355018 ***