After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 509767 - crash in File Browser: chiedevo proprietà di un...
crash in File Browser: chiedevo proprietà di un...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 440988
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.18.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-01-15 22:08 UTC by alexandros
Modified: 2008-01-17 01:07 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.19/2.20



Description alexandros 2008-01-15 22:08:44 UTC
Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
chiedevo proprietà di un file


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 #1 SMP Mon Nov 12 08:32:57 UTC 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: SphereCrystal
Icon Theme: SphereCrystal

Memory status: size: 76693504 vsize: 76693504 resident: 27217920 share: 16113664 rss: 27217920 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1200421902 rtime: 4458 utime: 4209 stime: 249 cutime:0 cstime: 3 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb6d546b0 (LWP 4274)]
[New Thread 0xb642eb90 (LWP 8806)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6d546b0 (LWP 4274))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #7 raise
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #8 abort
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #9 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_assert_warning
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
  • #21 ??
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??
  • #24 ??
  • #25 ??
  • #26 ??
  • #27 ??
  • #28 ??
  • #29 ??
  • #30 ??
  • #31 ??
  • #32 ??
  • #33 ??
  • #34 ??
  • #35 ??
  • #36 ??
  • #37 ??
  • #38 ??
  • #39 ??
  • #40 ??
  • #41 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #42 ??
  • #43 ??
  • #44 ??
  • #45 ??
  • #46 ??
  • #47 ??
  • #48 ??
  • #49 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #50 ??
  • #51 ??
  • #52 ??
  • #53 ??
  • #54 ??
  • #55 ??
  • #56 g_sequence_sort_changed_iter
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
Gtk-ERROR **: file /tmp/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.12.1/gtk/gtkliststore.c: line 1677 (gtk_list_store_compare_func): assertion failed: (VALID_ITER (&iter_b, list_store))
aborting...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 André Klapper 2008-01-17 01:07:32 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 440988 ***