GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 509059
crash in Tasks: creating a new view for ...
Last modified: 2008-02-04 15:10:46 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? creating a new view for the address book Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-11-13 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.23.12-52.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Dec 18 21:18:02 EST 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Permissive Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Crux Icon Theme: Crux Memory status: size: 133705728 vsize: 133705728 resident: 56090624 share: 30822400 rss: 56090624 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1200172635 rtime: 14161 utime: 12454 stime: 1707 cutime:0 cstime: 3 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208538384 (LWP 22579)] [New Thread -1258292336 (LWP 22616)] [New Thread -1246577776 (LWP 22615)] [New Thread -1217221744 (LWP 22596)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 185114
Thread 1 (Thread -1208538384 (LWP 22579))
----------- .xsession-errors (217274 sec old) --------------------- (nm-applet:3038): Gtk-WARNING **: Icon cache '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache' is invalid (nm-applet:3038): Gtk-WARNING **: Icon cache '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache' is invalid (nm-applet:3038): Gtk-WARNING **: Icon cache '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache' is invalid (nm-applet:3038): Gtk-WARNING **: Icon cache '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache' is invalid ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 449652 ***