GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 508863
crash in Open Folder: Setting Emblem for folde...
Last modified: 2008-01-12 11:27:22 UTC
Version: 2.18.3 What were you doing when the application crashed? Setting Emblem for folder under Properties, I have regular crashes when right clicking on a folder and looking at properties Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1 System: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 #1 SMP Mon Nov 12 08:32:57 UTC 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Mist Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 86859776 vsize: 86859776 resident: 30011392 share: 14749696 rss: 30011392 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1200090194 rtime: 800 utime: 436 stime: 364 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb6d5b6b0 (LWP 3966)] (no debugging symbols found) 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 184997
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6d5b6b0 (LWP 3966))
----------- .xsession-errors (54688 sec old) --------------------- [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6d03b48]marker does not match f_code ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 355018 ***