GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 508401
crash in Tasks:
Last modified: 2008-01-18 12:30:36 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-11-13 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.23.12-52.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Dec 18 21:18:02 EST 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 160460800 vsize: 160460800 resident: 75718656 share: 35000320 rss: 75718656 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1199921586 rtime: 4733 utime: 4543 stime: 190 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208792336 (LWP 12394)] [New Thread -1311007856 (LWP 12459)] [New Thread -1260401776 (LWP 12425)] [New Thread -1239016560 (LWP 12398)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 184728
Thread 1 (Thread -1208792336 (LWP 12394))
----------- .xsession-errors (23746 sec old) --------------------- (evolution:2992): camel-imap-provider-CRITICAL **: imap_command_start: assertion `store->ostream!=NULL' failed (evolution:2992): camel-imap-provider-CRITICAL **: imap_command_start: assertion `store->ostream!=NULL' failed (evolution:2992): camel-imap-provider-CRITICAL **: imap_command_start: assertion `store->ostream!=NULL' failed (evolution:2992): camel-imap-provider-CRITICAL **: imap_command_start: assertion `store->ostream!=NULL' failed (evolution:2992): camel-imap-provider-CRITICAL **: imap_command_start: assertion `store->ostream!=NULL' failed (evolution:2992): camel-imap-provider-CRITICAL **: imap_command_start: assertion `store->ostream!=NULL' failed (evolution:2992): camel-imap-provider-CRITICAL **: imap_command_start: assertion `store->ostream!=NULL' failed ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 407187 ***