GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 507569
crash in File Browser: There was no problem, do...
Last modified: 2008-01-07 13:30:20 UTC
Version: 2.18.3 What were you doing when the application crashed? There was no problem, don't worrie, We had electrycal problems in my house. Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1 System: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 #1 SMP Mon Nov 12 08:32:57 UTC 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Crux Icon Theme: Crux Memory status: size: 97615872 vsize: 97615872 resident: 38912000 share: 16158720 rss: 38912000 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1199562802 rtime: 6678 utime: 6120 stime: 558 cutime:0 cstime: 1 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb6d9a6b0 (LWP 11232)] (no debugging symbols found) 0xb75d8321 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 184217
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6d9a6b0 (LWP 11232))
----------- .xsession-errors (16956 sec old) --------------------- [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not match f_code [mpeg4 @ 0xb6cefb48]marker does not ma ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 355018 ***