*** Bug 507203 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, the stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash.

Could you please help fixing this by installing some debugging packages [1], start the application as normal, and try to reproduce the crash, if possible?

Once bug-buddy pops up, you can find the stacktrace in the 'Details', now containing way more information. Please copy that stacktrace and paste it as a comment here. Thanks in advance!

[1] Please install debug packages for evolution, evolution-data-server, gtkhtml, gtk, glib, gnome-vfs, pango, libgnome and libgnomeui (as far as those packages are provided by your distribution).

More details can be found here: http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces

(In reply to comment #0)
> What were you doing when the application crashed?
> 
> 
> 
> Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
> Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian)
> BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1
> 
> System: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Aug 31 00:24:01 UTC 2007 i686
> X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
> X Vendor Release: 10300000
> Selinux: No
> Accessibility: Disabled
> GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
> Icon Theme: gnome
> 
> Memory status: size: 72728576 vsize: 72728576 resident: 27205632 share:
> 16994304 rss: 27205632 rss_rlim: 4294967295
> CPU usage: start_time: 1199351253 rtime: 219 utime: 201 stime: 18 cutime:2
> cstime: 4 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100
> 
> Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'
> 
> (no debugging symbols found)
> Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
> (no debugging symbols found)
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> [New Thread 0xb68026b0 (LWP 5458)]
> [New Thread 0xb49ebb90 (LWP 5504)]
> (no debugging symbols found)
> 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> #0  0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> #1  0xb77f38eb in waitpid () from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
> #2  0xb6ede724 in g_spawn_sync () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> #3  0xb6edea3c in g_spawn_command_line_sync () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> #4  0xb6680268 in ?? () from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
> #5  0x0805fe09 in ?? ()
> #6  0x0000000b in ?? ()
> #7  0x00000000 in ?? ()
> 
> Thread 2 (Thread 0xb49ebb90 (LWP 5504)):
> #0  0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #1  0xb77efaa5 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 ()
>    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
> No symbol table info available.
> #2  0xb6e8fff2 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> No symbol table info available.
> #3  0x0861bb30 in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #4  0x08170508 in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #5  0x080df038 in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #6  0xb6e902ff in g_async_queue_pop_unlocked () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> No symbol table info available.
> #7  0xb7bc2cb5 in e_msgport_wait () from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.9
> No symbol table info available.
> #8  0xb7bc339c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.9
> No symbol table info available.
> #9  0x080df038 in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #10 0x0861bb68 in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #11 0x00000000 in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> 
> Thread 1 (Thread 0xb68026b0 (LWP 5458)):
> #0  0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #1  0xb77f38eb in waitpid () from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
> No symbol table info available.
> #2  0xb6ede724 in g_spawn_sync () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> No symbol table info available.
> #3  0xb6edea3c in g_spawn_command_line_sync () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> No symbol table info available.
> #4  0xb6680268 in ?? () from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
> No symbol table info available.
> #5  0x0805fe09 in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #6  0x0000000b in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #7  0x00000000 in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #0  0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> The program is running.  Quit anyway (and detach it)? (y or n) [answered Y;
> input not from terminal]
> 
> 
> ----------- .xsession-errors (318 sec old) ---------------------
> xrdb:  "*Text.background" on line 226 overrides entry on line 191
> xrdb:  "*Label.foreground" on line 232 overrides entry on line 151
> xrdb:  "*Text.foreground" on line 238 overrides entry on line 192
> ** Message: <info>  You are now connected to the wired network.
> Window manager warning: last_user_time (3075978288) is greater than comparison
> timestamp (1053901717).  This most likely represents a buggy client sending
> inaccurate timestamps in messages such as _NE
> Window manager warning: 0x2800091 (Synaptic) appears to be one of the offending
> windows with a timestamp of 3075978288.  Working around...
> Window manager warning: last_user_time (3076125744) is greater than comparison
> timestamp (1053990721).  This most likely represents a buggy client sending
> inaccurate timestamps in messages such as _NE
> Window manager warning: 0x2800091 (Synaptic) appears to be one of the offending
> windows with a timestamp of 3076125744.  Working around...
> Another synaptic is running. Trying to bring it to the foreground
> Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "gnomebreakpad": libgnomebreakpad.so: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or directory
> Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "gnomebreakpad": libgnomebreakpad.so: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or directory
> Window manager warning: last_user_time (3076011056) is greater than comparison
> timestamp (1055051555).  This most likely represents a buggy client sending
> inaccurate timestamps in messages such as _NE
> Window manager warning: 0x2800091 (Synaptic) appears to be one of the offending
> windows with a timestamp of 3076011056.  Working around...
> Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "gnomebreakpad": libgnomebreakpad.so: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or directory
> --------------------------------------------------
> 

Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Aug 31 00:24:01 UTC 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 157601792 vsize: 157601792 resident: 54632448 share: 21430272 rss: 54632448 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1200298052 rtime: 40796 utime: 40650 stime: 146 cutime:3 cstime: 4 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb67386b0 (LWP 28025)]
[New Thread 0xb307bb90 (LWP 28471)]
[New Thread 0xb4e17b90 (LWP 28470)]
[New Thread 0xb2effb90 (LWP 28077)]
[New Thread 0xb3cfeb90 (LWP 28073)]
[New Thread 0xb44ffb90 (LWP 28057)]
[New Thread 0xb5678b90 (LWP 28055)]
[New Thread 0xb5e79b90 (LWP 28053)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 185247

----------- .xsession-errors (6 sec old) ---------------------
(evolution:28025): gtkhtml-WARNING **: Cannot create spell dictionary instance (iid:OAFIID:GNOME_Spell_Dictionary:0.3)
(evolution:28025): Bonobo-WARNING **: Activation exception 'Failed to activate 'OAFIID:GNOME_Spell_Control:0.3''
(evolution:28025): gtkhtml-WARNING **: Cannot create spell dictionary instance (iid:OAFIID:GNOME_Spell_Dictionary:0.3)
(evolution:28025): Bonobo-WARNING **: Activation exception 'Failed to activate 'OAFIID:GNOME_Spell_Control:0.3''
(evolution:28025): evolution-mail-WARNING **: Cannot activate OAFIID:GNOME_Spell_Dictionary:0.3
(evolution:28025): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_message_dialog_new: assertion `parent == NULL || GTK_IS_WINDOW (parent)' failed
(evolution:28025): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_window_set_title: assertion `GTK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed
(evolution:28025): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_ensure_style: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed
--------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the new trace. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 497901 ***