GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 506561
crash in Open Folder: Clicked an icon in the f...
Last modified: 2008-01-01 17:44:17 UTC
Version: 2.20.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? Clicked an icon in the folder being opened Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1 System: Linux 2.6.22-3-k7 #1 SMP Mon Nov 12 09:12:50 UTC 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10400000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 150282240 vsize: 150282240 resident: 99655680 share: 15093760 rss: 99655680 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1199102001 rtime: 2590 utime: 2281 stime: 309 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb6bad6c0 (LWP 3277)] 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 183621
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6bad6c0 (LWP 3277))
----------- .xsession-errors (9 sec old) --------------------- (nautilus:3277): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:3277): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:3277): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:3277): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:3277): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:3277): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:3277): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:3277): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 483884 ***