After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 506068 - crash in Tasks: Rien du tout!!!!
crash in Tasks: Rien du tout!!!!
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 447591
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
2.10.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-12-28 14:26 UTC by ldormoy
Modified: 2008-02-25 06:21 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description ldormoy 2007-12-28 14:26:35 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Rien du tout!!!!


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 23:10:59 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 147791872 vsize: 147791872 resident: 66682880 share: 41062400 rss: 66682880 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1198838727 rtime: 7012 utime: 6410 stime: 602 cutime:48 cstime: 21 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208514848 (LWP 3139)]
[New Thread -1241142384 (LWP 3849)]
[New Thread -1293653104 (LWP 3192)]
[New Thread -1230652528 (LWP 3163)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208514848 (LWP 3139))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 g_slice_alloc
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_hash_table_insert
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 gdk_event_new
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 gtk_container_propagate_expose
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_container_propagate_expose
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #33 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #34 gtk_container_propagate_expose
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #35 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #36 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #37 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #38 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #39 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #40 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #41 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #42 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #43 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #44 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #45 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #46 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #47 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #48 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #49 gdk_window_process_all_updates
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #50 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #51 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #52 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #53 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #54 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #55 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #56 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (96 sec old) ---------------------
CALLBACK: fill-authentication!!!
connection_message_func(): Callback
CALLBACK: full-authentication!!!
connection_message_func(): Callback
CALLBACK: save-authentication!!!
connection_message_func(): Callback
CALLBACK: save-authentication!!!
(evolution:3139): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_toggle_button_get_active: assertion `GTK_IS_TOGGLE_BUTTON (toggle_button)' failed
(evolution:3139): e-utils-WARNING **: Cannot resolve symbol 'org_gnome_new_mail_config' in plugin '/usr/lib/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-new-mail-notify.so' (not exported?)
(evolution:3139): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xa08d488'
(evolution:3139): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xa08d5a8'
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Tobias Mueller 2008-02-25 06:21:46 UTC
Dear Reporter,

thanks for you bugreport :)
This particular bug is very likely to
be the fedora specific bug 447591 where 
   GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal
   `source_selected' is invalid for instance
indicates some memory corruption. Hence marking this as dup of bug 447591.

Feel free to report more bugs ;-)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 447591 ***