Bug 505952 – crash in Open Folder: Copying photos from memo...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 505952 - crash in Open Folder: Copying photos from memo...


Summary:	crash in Open Folder: Copying photos from memo...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 485526

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.18.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-12-27 19:21 UTC by mij
Modified:	2007-12-27 20:22 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.19/2.20

Description mij 2007-12-27 19:21:50 UTC

Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Copying photos from memory card


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Nov 4 18:18:09 UTC 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 395902976 vsize: 395902976 resident: 30527488 share: 17670144 rss: 30527488 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1198780991 rtime: 406 utime: 248 stime: 158 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x2b53249b6540 (LWP 12232)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b531df3c34f in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 183253

Thread 1 (Thread 0x2b53249b6540 (LWP 12232))

#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 g_spawn_sync
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 g_spawn_command_line_sync
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3 ??
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 strcmp
from /lib/libc.so.6
#6 ??
#7 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_list_store_remove
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_list_store_clear
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 ??
#19 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 nautilus_file_emit_changed
#24 nautilus_directory_emit_change_signals
#25 nautilus_file_changed
#26 ??
#27 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
#28 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 ??
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 main
#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0



----------- .xsession-errors (45 sec old) ---------------------
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Cosimo Cecchi 2007-12-27 20:22:27 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 485526 ***