After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 503916 - Support for other disc image formats
Support for other disc image formats
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: brasero
Classification: Applications
Component: general
3.10.x
Other Linux
: Low enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Brasero maintainer(s)
Brasero maintainer(s)
: 345669 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-12-16 21:26 UTC by Michael Monreal
Modified: 2018-08-21 08:23 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Michael Monreal 2007-12-16 21:26:33 UTC
I had a talk about burning applications on linux with some friends today. One feature that nearly everyone seems to be missing in the current apps seems to be support for some of the more popular image formats:

* Clone CD (.ccd, .img, .sub)
* Alcohol 120% (.mdf, mds)
* Prassi (?) (.gi)
* Nero (.nrg)

Right now these require using windows software most of the time I think. Would be great if Brasero could have native support to burn and/or convert them. Perhaps as individual plugins?
Comment 1 Philippe Rouquier 2007-12-17 15:28:28 UTC
I completely agree with you; that was what I also had in mind when I created plugin system backend: be able to add easily such functionality. I already gathered a few information about these formats. Now the problem is time; I think I'll start to integrate the most common formats (probably nero's) by 0.8.x.
Comment 2 Michael Monreal 2007-12-17 15:51:20 UTC
Sounds nice. Also, perhaps implementing one or two of those would make a nice project for next year's google summer of code? (if there will be a soc next year)
Comment 3 Luis Medinas 2007-12-18 13:11:20 UTC
Yeah the idea is awesome and it's enough work to do in SOC, maybe we can propose it.
Comment 4 Nicolò Chieffo 2008-03-03 12:52:13 UTC
I hope this feature will be implemented soon! Thanks
Comment 5 joerg.schilling 2009-07-01 19:46:51 UTC
These image format all look proprietary to me.
Do you have reliable official documentations
for the formats inquestion?

Comment 6 Philippe Rouquier 2009-07-30 11:19:07 UTC
*** Bug 345669 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 André Klapper 2015-01-24 19:05:14 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> These image format all look proprietary to me.
> Do you have reliable official documentations
> for the formats inquestion?

Question still unanswered; setting NEEDINFO
Comment 8 André Klapper 2018-08-21 08:23:28 UTC
(In reply to joerg.schilling from comment #5)
> These image format all look proprietary to me.
> Do you have reliable official documentations for the formats in question?

Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug report if you can provide the information that was asked for in a previous comment, and request *one* format per *one* report, if (some of) those formats are still popular nowadays. Thanks!