After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 503362 - From address with dot in realname not parsed correctly
From address with dot in realname not parsed correctly
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 347520
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.12.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-12-13 04:12 UTC by Ted Percival
Modified: 2009-04-20 13:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.19/2.20



Description Ted Percival 2007-12-13 04:12:09 UTC
I have a message showing up as
  From: LWN.netW <eekly Notification lwn@lwn.net>
although the message source has
  From: LWN.net Weekly Notification <lwn@lwn.net>

Here is the full set of headers except for X-Evolution-Source.

Return-path: <corbet@lwn.net>
Envelope-to: ted@midg3t.net
Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:09:54 +1000
Received: from rs.lwn.net ([66.216.68.48] helo=lwn.net) by erwin.midg3t.net
        with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <corbet@lwn.net>) id 1J2eSP-0000Gy-4E
        for ted@midg3t.net; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:09:53 +1000
Received: (qmail 3698 invoked by uid 1014); 13 Dec 2007 03:12:11 -0000
Date: 13 Dec 2007 03:12:11 -0000
Message-ID: <20071213031211.3697.qmail@lwn.net>
To: ted@midg3t.net
From: LWN.net Weekly Notification <lwn@lwn.net>
Subject: LWN.net Weekly Edition for December 13, 2007 available
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Comment 1 Jeffrey Stedfast 2007-12-13 18:15:42 UTC
this is actually a duplicate (unfortunately don't know the original bug # off the top of my head, maybe Andre can find it?)

the problem is that "LWN.net Weekly Notification" is not quoted in the address field as it should be (because of the '.', not the '.net') and the parser somehow breaks.
Comment 2 Ted Percival 2007-12-31 05:46:29 UTC
Could you point out where I might find the code that does that parsing? I had a look but didn't find it.
Comment 3 Milan Crha 2009-04-20 13:47:15 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 347520 ***