After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 50160 - GConf gets confused about notification when using non-default contexts
GConf gets confused about notification when using non-default contexts
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 107692
Product: GConf
Classification: Deprecated
Component: gconf
unspecified
Other other
: Normal minor
: future
Assigned To: GConf Maintainers
GConf Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2000-12-16 21:25 UTC by Havoc Pennington
Modified: 2005-11-20 01:01 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.0


Description Havoc Pennington 2000-12-16 21:25:58 UTC 
Package: gconf
Version: CVS

If you change a value without using the default context, but your
non-default source is part of the default source stack, GConf won't
notice.

Havoc






------- Bug moved to this database by martin@bugzilla.gnome.org 2000-12-16 16:25 -------

This bug previously known as bug 3534 at http://bugs.gnome.org/
http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534
Originally filed under the gconf product and general component.

The original owner of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, martin@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous owner is unknown.
Bug assigned to new owner, setting status to "NEW".
   Previous status was "UNCONFIRMED".
Comment 1 Luis Villa 2002-01-24 20:20:51 UTC 
Re-assigning, since martin isn't involved ATM. hp- this is a fairly
old bug; is it still relevant?
Comment 2 Luis Villa 2002-01-24 20:40:55 UTC 
Argh. and moving out of unconfirmed.
Comment 3 Havoc Pennington 2002-01-24 20:46:40 UTC 
Yes, this bug still exists, but I'm ignoring it for gnome 2.
It doesn't matter too much in practice.
Comment 4 Havoc Pennington 2003-03-06 03:12:15 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 107692 ***