After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 500302 - Urdu Language code
Urdu Language code
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: damned-lies
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: damned-lies Maintainer(s)
damned-lies Maintainer(s)
: 514348 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-11-28 21:35 UTC by Djihed Afifi
Modified: 2008-02-04 18:37 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Djihed Afifi 2007-11-28 21:35:51 UTC
What are we following with language codes in GNOME and l10n?

According to ISO 639-1*, the code is "ur", but we have a "urd" in http://l10n.gnome.org/languages/urd/

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urdu
Comment 1 Claude Paroz 2007-11-28 21:57:09 UTC
Seems "urd" is the ISO 639-2 code for Urdu. But you're right, when there's a 639-1 code, it is preferred over the 639-2.
As there aren't any translations currently, we should be able to make the change without any additional work. 
Comment 2 Gil Forcada 2007-12-03 22:13:28 UTC
this is the only change we have to made?

Index: translation-teams.xml.in
===================================================================
--- translation-teams.xml.in    (revision 645)
+++ translation-teams.xml.in    (working copy)
@@ -625,8 +625,8 @@
     <_language id="uk">Ukrainian</_language>
     <coordinator id="mdziumanenko"/>
   </team>
-  <team id="urd">
-    <_language id="urd">Urdu</_language>
+  <team id="ur">
+    <_language id="ur">Urdu</_language>
     <coordinator id="x-muhammadwaqasalam"/>
     <webpage>http://www.urduweb.org/</webpage>
   </team>


if so, it can be committed :)
Comment 3 Danilo Segan 2007-12-04 09:48:13 UTC
It might be worth checking why we went with 'urd' in the first place: it sometimes happens that a language code has "sublanguages", but I can't seem to find any proof of that for Urdu. 

So, I'd just say to go ahead with committing this.
Comment 4 Claude Paroz 2008-01-12 15:00:18 UTC
Seems this has already been committed. I also changed the Bugzilla l10n compnonent.
Comment 5 Claude Paroz 2008-02-04 18:32:25 UTC
*** Bug 514348 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Claude Paroz 2008-02-04 18:33:19 UTC
Really fixed in rev. 731.
Comment 7 Thomas Thurman 2008-02-04 18:37:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Seems this has already been committed. I also changed the Bugzilla l10n
> compnonent.

It is still called "Urdu [urd]" though.