GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 497408
crash in Rhythmbox Music Player:
Last modified: 2007-11-18 14:50:03 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Enforcing Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 126767104 vsize: 126767104 resident: 28745728 share: 16449536 rss: 28745728 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1195227429 rtime: 752 utime: 674 stime: 78 cutime:5 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/rhythmbox' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1209075152 (LWP 3671)] [New Thread -1248973936 (LWP 3765)] [New Thread -1271919728 (LWP 3747)] [New Thread -1261089904 (LWP 3677)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x0018e402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 178151
Thread 2 (Thread -1248973936 (LWP 3765))
----------- .xsession-errors (34 sec old) --------------------- ** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1) ** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2) ** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1) ** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2) ** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1) ** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2) ** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1) ** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2) ** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1) ** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2) (rhythmbox:3671): libgnomevfs-CRITICAL **: gnome_vfs_close_cancellable: assertion `handle != NULL' failed GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 171 (): error '设备或资源忙' during 'pthread_mutex_destroy ((pthread_mutex_t *) mutex)' aborting... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 434003 ***