GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 496418
crash in Computer:
Last modified: 2007-11-13 21:56:46 UTC
Version: 2.20.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Unknown Gnome Release: 2.20.1 2007-11-09 (JHBuild) BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1 System: Linux 2.6.23.1-mactel #1 SMP Fri Nov 9 19:12:52 CET 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10400000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Compact Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 167342080 vsize: 167342080 resident: 115224576 share: 15343616 rss: 115224576 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1194954659 rtime: 5570 utime: 4557 stime: 1013 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/local/bin/nautilus' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb6d516c0 (LWP 12795)] 0xb7fd1410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 177398
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6d516c0 (LWP 12795))
----------- .xsession-errors (6 sec old) --------------------- (nautilus:12795): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (nautilus:12795): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_height: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (nautilus:12795): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_scale_simple: assertion `dest_height > 0' failed (nautilus:12795): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:12795): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:12795): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:12795): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:12795): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 483884 ***