GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 492817
crash in Open Folder: ping -l 65510 www.ris-me...
Last modified: 2007-11-03 01:38:27 UTC
Version: 2.18.1 What were you doing when the application crashed? ping -l 65510 www.ris-media.dk Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Enforcing Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 83636224 vsize: 83636224 resident: 26931200 share: 14471168 rss: 26931200 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1194050020 rtime: 717 utime: 676 stime: 41 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208346912 (LWP 3549)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x001ef402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 174689
Thread 1 (Thread -1208346912 (LWP 3549))
----------- .xsession-errors (29 sec old) --------------------- This can cause subtle evils like #48423 (nautilus:3549): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_filename_display_basename: assertion `filename != NULL' failed (nautilus:3549): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_label_set_label: assertion `str != NULL' failed (nautilus:3549): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_filename_display_basename: assertion `filename != NULL' failed (nautilus:3549): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_filename_display_basename: assertion `filename != NULL' failed (nautilus:3549): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_filename_display_basename: assertion `filename != NULL' failed (nautilus:3549): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_filename_display_basename: assertion `filename != NULL' failed (nautilus:3549): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_filename_display_basename: assertion `filename != NULL' failed --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 436071 ***