After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 490112 - crash in Tasks: trying to reply to an em...
crash in Tasks: trying to reply to an em...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 458322
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
2.10.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 490113 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-10-25 11:47 UTC by mary.bennett
Modified: 2007-10-25 17:48 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description mary.bennett 2007-10-25 11:47:00 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
trying to reply to an email message


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 23:10:59 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Clearlooks

Memory status: size: 194617344 vsize: 194617344 resident: 88834048 share: 59863040 rss: 88834048 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1193100967 rtime: 7377 utime: 6771 stime: 606 cutime:93 cstime: 165 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208940832 (LWP 20438)]
[New Thread -1244415088 (LWP 20496)]
[New Thread -1299580016 (LWP 20446)]
[New Thread -1233515632 (LWP 20441)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208940832 (LWP 20438))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 g_utf8_offset_to_pointer
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib/libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
  • #7 ??
    from /usr/lib/libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
  • #8 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_signal_emitv
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_bindings_activate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_window_propagate_key_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #28 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #29 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #33 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #34 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #35 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #36 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #37 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #38 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #39 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #40 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #41 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #42 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (354 sec old) ---------------------
** (evolution:20438): DEBUG: mailto URL program: evolution
libnm_glib_nm_state_cb: dbus returned an error.
  (org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown) The name org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files
(evolution:20438): e-data-server-DEBUG: Loading categories from "/tp/home/mob/.evolution/categories.xml"
(evolution:20438): e-data-server-DEBUG: Loaded 29 categories
camel-Message: --
Window manager warning: Buggy client sent a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message with a timestamp of 0 for 0x3c00003 (Evince Doc)
Window manager warning: meta_window_activate called by a pager with a 0 timestamp; the pager needs to be fixed.
Window manager warning: Buggy client sent a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message with a timestamp of 0 for 0x3c00003 (Evince Doc)
Window manager warning: meta_window_activate called by a pager with a 0 timestamp; the pager needs to be fixed.
Window manager warning: Buggy client sent a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message with a timestamp of 0 for 0x3c00003 (Evince Doc)
Window manager warning: meta_window_activate called by a pager with a 0 timestamp; the pager needs to be fixed.
Window manager warning: Buggy client sent a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message with a timestamp of 0 for 0x3c00003 (Evince Doc)
Window manager warning: meta_window_activate called by a pager with a 0 timestamp; the pager needs to be fixed.
BBDB spinning up...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-10-25 12:24:32 UTC
*** Bug 490113 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Tobias Mueller 2007-10-25 17:48:42 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458322 ***