After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 490056 - crash in Computer: I was navigate in direct...
crash in Computer: I was navigate in direct...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 356672
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.18.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-10-25 07:47 UTC by cedric.olivier
Modified: 2007-10-25 11:35 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18


Description cedric.olivier 2007-10-25 07:47:58 UTC 
Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I was navigate in directory with nautilus


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 23:10:59 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 134107136 vsize: 134107136 resident: 77197312 share: 32157696 rss: 77197312 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1193259179 rtime: 5775 utime: 2886 stime: 2889 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1209067808 (LWP 9675)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 172715

Thread 1 (Thread -1209067808 (LWP 9675))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #5 raise
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 abort
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #7 g_logv
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_log
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_assert_warning
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
  • #11 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_tree_row_reference_free
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor_on_cell
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #24 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #25 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #27 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
Sample Size    : 16-bit (2 bytes)
Sample Encoding: signed (2's complement)
Channels       : 2
Sample Rate    : 44100

Time: 00:00.09 [00:00.64] of 00:00.74 ( 12.6%) Output Buffer:   4.42K
Time: 00:00.19 [00:00.55] of 00:00.74 ( 25.2%) Output Buffer:   8.88K
Time: 00:00.28 [00:00.46] of 00:00.74 ( 37.8%) Output Buffe
Done.
** ERROR **: file fm-tree-model.c: line 1531 (fm_tree_model_unref_node): assertion failed: (node->ref_count > 0)
aborting...
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libpopt.so.0" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?)
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?)
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Christoph Wolk 2007-10-25 11:35:25 UTC 
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 356672 ***