GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 489653
crash in Image Viewer: Openning an image
Last modified: 2007-10-27 12:09:25 UTC
Version: 2.18.2 What were you doing when the application crashed? Openning an image Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.22.4-65.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Aug 21 21:50:50 EDT 2007 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Enforcing Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Bluecurve Icon Theme: Bluecurve Memory status: size: 272920576 vsize: 272920576 resident: 6848512 share: 5197824 rss: 6848512 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1193190530 rtime: 20 utime: 17 stime: 3 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/eog' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 46912496350416 (LWP 3457)] [New Thread 1084229968 (LWP 3459)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x0000003ef4ac82e6 in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+ Trace 172417
Thread 2 (Thread 1084229968 (LWP 3459))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?) warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib64/libdbus-glib-1.so.2" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?) warning: .dynamic section for "/lib64/libssl.so.6" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations warning: .dynamic section for "/lib64/libcrypto.so.6" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations warning: .dynamic section for "/lib64/libselinux.so.1" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in version 2.20. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 357405 ***