After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 486938 - crash in Open Folder: back or up i think
crash in Open Folder: back or up i think
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 424980
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.18.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-10-15 19:55 UTC by louis_xv
Modified: 2007-10-19 22:16 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description louis_xv 2007-10-15 19:55:19 UTC
Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
back or up i think


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 23:10:59 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 98553856 vsize: 98553856 resident: 41570304 share: 26865664 rss: 41570304 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1192470266 rtime: 704 utime: 637 stime: 67 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1209071904 (LWP 2732)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1209071904 (LWP 2732))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #5 raise
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 abort
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #7 g_logv
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_log
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_assert_warning
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
  • #11 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 gtk_tree_row_reference_free
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor_on_cell
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
  • #22 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #25 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #26 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/share/screenlets-manager/screenlets-manager.py", line 23, in <module>
    import screenlets
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/screenlets/__init__.py", line 33, in <module>
    import rsvg
ImportError: No module named rsvg
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/share/screenlets-manager/screenlets-manager.py", line 23, in <module>
    import screenlets
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/screenlets/__init__.py", line 33, in <module>
    import rsvg
ImportError: No module named rsvg
** ERROR **: file fm-tree-model.c: line 1527 (fm_tree_model_unref_node): assertion failed: (parent->dummy_child_ref_count > 0)
aborting...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Christian Kirbach 2007-10-19 22:16:20 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 424980 ***