After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 486306 - crash in File Browser: Click in Propriedades of...
crash in File Browser: Click in Propriedades of...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 479483
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.18.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-10-13 12:34 UTC by lowdread
Modified: 2007-10-13 13:08 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description lowdread 2007-10-13 12:34:16 UTC
Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Click in Propriedades of a file for information (file is a rmvb)


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-03 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1

System: Linux 2.6.21-2-k7 #1 SMP Wed Jul 11 04:29:08 UTC 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Foresight
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 68030464 vsize: 68030464 resident: 26112000 share: 14585856 rss: 26112000 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1192278815 rtime: 161 utime: 144 stime: 17 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1227082064 (LWP 5762)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xb7f737f2 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2

Thread 1 (Thread -1227082064 (LWP 5762))

  • #0 ??
    from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
    from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  • #5 raise
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #6 abort
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #7 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_assert_warning
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 gtk_list_item_new_with_label
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_sequence_iter_is_begin
  • #12 g_sequence_iter_is_begin
  • #13 g_sequence_sort_changed_iter
  • #14 gtk_list_item_new_with_label
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_list_store_set_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_list_store_set
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 eel_mime_application_chooser_get_type
    from /usr/lib/libeel-2-2.18.so
  • #18 eel_mime_application_chooser_new
    from /usr/lib/libeel-2-2.18.so
  • #19 fm_properties_window_get_type
  • #20 nautilus_directory_schedule_dequeue_pending
  • #21 nautilus_directory_async_state_changed
  • #22 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #24 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #25 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #26 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 main
  • #0 ??
    from /lib/ld-linux.so.2


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
Gtk-ERROR **: file /tmp/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.12.0/gtk/gtkliststore.c: line 1677 (gtk_list_store_compare_func): assertion failed: (VALID_ITER (&iter_b, list_store))
aborting...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Christian Kirbach 2007-10-13 13:08:32 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 479483 ***