GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 485781
crash in Tasks: Reading mail.
Last modified: 2007-10-11 19:17:50 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? Reading mail. Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.20-2936.fc7xen #1 SMP Fri Sep 21 12:07:35 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Enforcing Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: nuoveXT-1.6 Memory status: size: 123244544 vsize: 123244544 resident: 44179456 share: 29351936 rss: 44179456 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1192118500 rtime: 694 utime: 506 stime: 188 cutime:191 cstime: 30 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/nosegneg/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208830240 (LWP 21813)] [New Thread -1256559728 (LWP 21899)] [New Thread -1281754224 (LWP 21889)] [New Thread -1246069872 (LWP 21844)] [New Thread -1224688752 (LWP 21840)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00da3402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 169537
Thread 2 (Thread -1256559728 (LWP 21899))
----------- .xsession-errors (43364 sec old) --------------------- CLIENT: Task: Task::done() CLIENT: Task: emitting finished QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver CLIENT: Task: Task::done() CLIENT: Task: emitting finished QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver CLIENT: Task: Task::done() CLIENT: Task: emitting finished ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 339602 ***