After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 482863 - crash in Tasks:
crash in Tasks:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 444866
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-10-03 07:54 UTC by selim.dogguy
Modified: 2007-10-07 15:08 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description selim.dogguy 2007-10-03 07:54:17 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.5-76.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Aug 30 13:47:21 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Permissive
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 232472576 vsize: 232472576 resident: 140615680 share: 43995136 rss: 140615680 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1191226485 rtime: 26700 utime: 21175 stime: 5525 cutime:142 cstime: 1036 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208338720 (LWP 8551)]
[New Thread -1378505840 (LWP 24341)]
[New Thread -1326056560 (LWP 8820)]
[New Thread -1274696816 (LWP 8604)]
[New Thread -1264206960 (LWP 8576)]
[New Thread -1221928048 (LWP 8572)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208338720 (LWP 8551))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_slice_free_chain_with_offset
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_slist_free
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #12 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #15 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #18 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #19 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #21 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #24 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #25 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #26 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #27 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #28 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #29 g_object_unref
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #31 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #33 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #34 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #35 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #36 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #37 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #38 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #39 g_object_run_dispose
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #40 gtk_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #41 gtk_widget_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #42 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #43 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #44 gtk_container_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #45 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #46 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #47 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #48 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #49 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #50 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #51 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #52 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #53 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #54 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #55 g_object_unref
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #56 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #57 g_value_unset
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #58 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #59 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #60 gtk_container_remove
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #61 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #62 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #63 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #64 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #65 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #66 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #67 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #68 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #69 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #70 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #71 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #72 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #73 html_engine_parse
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #74 gtk_html_begin_full
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #75 gtk_html_begin
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #76 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #77 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #78 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #79 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #80 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #81 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #82 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #83 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #84 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #85 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #86 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #87 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #88 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (539 sec old) ---------------------
** Message: Unable to load pilot cradle info, assuming unset
** Message: No pilot userid/username information located
** Message: Unable to load pilot id/username, assuming unset
** Message: No pilot cradle information located
** Message: Unable to load pilot cradle info, assuming unset
(evolution:8551): camel-CRITICAL **: camel_folder_free_message_info: assertion `info != NULL' failed
(evolution:8551): e-utils-WARNING **: Cannot resolve symbol 'org_gnome_new_mail_config' in plugin '/usr/lib/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-new-mail-notify.so' (not exported?)
(evolution:8551): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xa9daeb0'
(evolution:8551): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xc1f8010'
(evolution:8551): Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow is too large to allow the use of shape masks or shape regions.
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Suman Manjunath 2007-10-07 15:08:36 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 444866 ***