After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 476926 - Evolution has a Gtk-Doc configure option, but we don't ship any Gtk-Doc content
Evolution has a Gtk-Doc configure option, but we don't ship any Gtk-Doc content
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.12.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-09-14 14:31 UTC by Matthew Barnes
Modified: 2013-09-13 00:55 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
configure.in patch (2.00 KB, patch)
2007-09-14 14:41 UTC, Matthew Barnes 		committed Details | Review

Description Matthew Barnes 2007-09-14 14:31:24 UTC 
Evolution supports an --enable-gtk-doc configure option, but the only Gtk-Doc content is in devel-docs/camel (Camel API) and doc/devel (Evolution Developer Guide), neither of which we ship.

The Camel docs can obviously be killed.  These live in E-D-S now.

I suggest moving the Developer Guide sources to the gnomeweb-wml module (if they're not there already), and then remove the Gtk-Doc configure option.
Comment 1 Matthew Barnes 2007-09-14 14:41:41 UTC 
Created attachment 95595 [details] [review]
configure.in patch

This patch removes the --enable-gtk-doc configure option, as well as the Gtk-Doc messages at the end of the configure script.
Comment 2 Srinivasa Ragavan 2007-09-27 08:03:44 UTC 
What do you mean by kill Camel docs? We shouldn't remove it from svn of course. Anyways We can push this to head.
Comment 3 Matthew Barnes 2007-09-27 11:55:43 UTC 
There's two sets of Camel docs:

   evolution-data-server/docs/reference/camel
   evolution/devel_docs/camel

The latter is an artifact of when Camel lived in Evolution several years ago.  The docs are severely out of date, and redundant.  The real docs now live in Evolution Data Server.  I'm suggesting we remove the obsolete Camel docs from Evolution.

Also, what do you think about moving the Developer Guide in evolution/doc/devel to the project website?  It too looks out of date but it has a better chance of being updated if people can actually see it.
Comment 4 Matthew Barnes 2007-09-27 15:03:38 UTC 
Committed patch to Subversion trunk (revision 34321).

We should move the discussion about what to do with the unshipped docs that are still in trunk to bug #478704.