Bug 476221 – crash in Tasks: Writing an Email

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 476221 - crash in Tasks: Writing an Email


Summary:	crash in Tasks: Writing an Email


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 458322

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Tasks
Version:	2.10.x (obsolete)
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	evolution-calendar-maintainers
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:	aklapper[fc7]

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-09-12 14:19 UTC by msoffen
Modified:	2007-09-20 19:18 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description msoffen 2007-09-12 14:19:22 UTC

Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Writing an Email


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.1-41.fc7 #1 SMP Fri Jul 27 18:10:34 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 225189888 vsize: 225189888 resident: 89292800 share: 49111040 rss: 89292800 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1189518163 rtime: 22608 utime: 21226 stime: 1382 cutime:95 cstime: 110 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208805664 (LWP 30162)]
[New Thread -1275413616 (LWP 31698)]
[New Thread -1329546352 (LWP 30253)]
[New Thread -1254442096 (LWP 30199)]
[New Thread -1221391472 (LWP 30198)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x004ca991 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 162358

Thread 1 (Thread -1208805664 (LWP 30162))

#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#2 ??
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 g_utf8_offset_to_pointer
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#5 ??
from /usr/lib/libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
#6 ??
from /usr/lib/libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
#7 ??
from /usr/lib/libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
#8 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#9 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#26 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_widget_grab_focus
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#34 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#35 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#36 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#37 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#38 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#39 gtk_widget_child_focus
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#40 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#41 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#42 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#43 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#44 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#45 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#46 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#47 gtk_widget_child_focus
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#48 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#49 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#50 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#51 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#52 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#53 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#54 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#55 gtk_widget_child_focus
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#56 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#57 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#58 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#59 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#60 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#61 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#62 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#63 gtk_widget_child_focus
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#64 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#65 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#66 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#67 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#68 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#69 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#70 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#71 gtk_widget_child_focus
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#72 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#73 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#74 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#75 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#76 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#77 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#78 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#79 gtk_widget_child_focus
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#80 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#81 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#82 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#83 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#84 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#85 g_signal_emitv
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#86 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#87 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#88 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#89 gtk_bindings_activate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#90 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#91 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#92 ??
from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
#93 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#94 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#95 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#96 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#97 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#98 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#99 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#100 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#101 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#102 ??
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#103 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#104 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#105 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#106 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#107 main
#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0



----------- .xsession-errors (15 sec old) ---------------------
  Major opcode:  158
  Minor opcode:  6
  Resource id:  0x328
X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) 8
  Major opcode:  158
  Minor opcode:  6
  Resource id:  0x328
X Error: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter) 4
  Major opcode:  54
  Minor opcode:  0
  Resource id:  0x14a67a7
X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) 8
  Major opcode:  158
  Minor opcode:  6
  Resource id:  0x14a67a7
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Tobias Mueller 2007-09-20 18:08:20 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458322 ***

Comment 2 msoffen 2007-09-20 18:57:00 UTC

I'm not sure which questions you need answered.   I looked at 458322 and I didn't see any questions there.

Comment 3 Tobias Mueller 2007-09-20 19:18:22 UTC

Oh well, you are right ;-)

Thank you for your point, and thanks for looking after it :) Now there should be a question. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask them :)

Cheers