After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 472585 - crash in gThumb Image Viewer:
crash in gThumb Image Viewer:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 472785
Product: gthumb
Classification: Other
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Paolo Bacchilega
Paolo Bacchilega
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-09-01 17:10 UTC by zbynek
Modified: 2007-09-04 12:43 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18


Description zbynek 2007-09-01 17:10:02 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Unknown
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-07 (Archlinux)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1

System: Linux 2.6.22-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Aug 23 20:18:37 CEST 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: MurrinaVerdeOlivo
Icon Theme: glass-icons

Memory status: size: 86810624 vsize: 86810624 resident: 51478528 share: 14499840 rss: 51478528 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1188666573 rtime: 1108 utime: 1050 stime: 58 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gthumb'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1227225408 (LWP 5301)]
[New Thread -1244710000 (LWP 5331)]
[New Thread -1257477232 (LWP 5330)]
[New Thread -1255892080 (LWP 5329)]
[New Thread -1256420464 (LWP 5328)]
[New Thread -1256948848 (LWP 5327)]
[New Thread -1254438000 (LWP 5317)]
[New Thread -1253909616 (LWP 5316)]
[New Thread -1253381232 (LWP 5315)]
[New Thread -1235788912 (LWP 5307)]
[New Thread -1234461808 (LWP 5306)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xb7f75410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 159655

Thread 1 (Thread -1227225408 (LWP 5301))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 ??
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 add_scheme_if_absent
    from /usr/lib/libgthumb.so
  • #5 uricmp
    from /usr/lib/libgthumb.so
  • #6 g_list_find_custom
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgthumb.so
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgthumb.so
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
  • #15 gthumb_marshal_VOID__INT_BOXED
    from /usr/lib/libgthumb.so
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 


----------- .xsession-errors (39 sec old) ---------------------
** Message: Failed to close thumbnail pixbuf loader for /home/fotky/2007-09-01/p1050372.jpg: Chyba při interpretaci souboru obrázku JPEG (Application transferred too few scanlines)
** Message: Failed to close thumbnail pixbuf loader for /home/fotky/2007-09-01/p1050372.jpg: Chyba při interpretaci souboru obrázku JPEG (Application transferred too few scanlines)
** Message: Failed to close thumbnail pixbuf loader for /home/fotky/2007-09-01/p1050372.jpg: Chyba při interpretaci souboru obrázku JPEG (Application transferred too few scanlines)
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Michael Chudobiak 2007-09-04 12:19:08 UTC 
What version of gthumb were you using? Can you try gthumb 2.10.6?

- Mike
Comment 2 zbynek 2007-09-04 12:29:00 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> What version of gthumb were you using? Can you try gthumb 2.10.6?
> 
> - Mike
> 

Actually, it is 2.10.6. This crash happens when deleting files (jpeg) in fullscreen (F11) view.
Comment 3 Michael Chudobiak 2007-09-04 12:43:08 UTC 
Probably a duplicate of bug 472785.

- Mike


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 472785 ***