GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 469734
crash in Rhythmbox Music Player: Closing Rhythmbox
Last modified: 2007-08-26 22:01:55 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? Closing Rhythmbox Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.22.1-41.fc7 #1 SMP Fri Jul 27 18:21:43 EDT 2007 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Enforcing Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 472195072 vsize: 472195072 resident: 43536384 share: 24186880 rss: 43536384 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1187906082 rtime: 478 utime: 376 stime: 102 cutime:4 cstime: 2 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/rhythmbox' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 46912517718288 (LWP 3553)] [New Thread 1210108240 (LWP 3983)] [New Thread 1136679248 (LWP 3707)] [New Thread 1094719824 (LWP 3558)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x000000382d60c808 in __lll_mutex_lock_wait () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 157477
Thread 2 (Thread 1210108240 (LWP 3983))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- Unmatched element: package Unmatched element: package Unmatched element: package Unmatched element: package Unmatched element: package Unmatched element: package Unmatched element: package Unmatched element: package (rhythmbox:3553): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: trying to read a non-existing handle (rhythmbox:3553): libgnomevfs-CRITICAL **: gnome_vfs_close_cancellable: assertion `handle != NULL' failed GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 171 (): error 'Device or resource busy' during 'pthread_mutex_destroy ((pthread_mutex_t *) mutex)' aborting... --------------------------------------------------
Looks like a duplicate of bug 434003. Same errors in .xsession and similar stacks. It's running in x86_64 too, should that matter.
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 434003 ***