Bug 467221 – crash in Home Folder:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 467221 - crash in Home Folder:


Summary:	crash in Home Folder:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 460524

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-08-16 07:07 UTC by sunfires
Modified:	2007-08-21 20:50 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.19/2.20

Description sunfires 2007-08-16 07:07:20 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7.90 (Rawhide)
Gnome Release: 2.19.5 2007-07-08 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-2925.14.fc8xen #1 SMP Tue Jul 24 15:30:41 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Enabled
GTK+ Theme: Bluecurve
Icon Theme: Bluecurve

Memory status: size: 182067200 vsize: 182067200 resident: 90144768 share: 30617600 rss: 90144768 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1187247385 rtime: 1527 utime: 1274 stime: 253 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/nosegneg/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208195312 (LWP 2953)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00b9e402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 155593

Thread 1 (Thread -1208195312 (LWP 2953))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 g_logv
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#5 g_log
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 g_assert_warning
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 ??
#8 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOXED
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_tree_model_row_deleted
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_list_store_remove
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_list_store_clear
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
#23 ??
#24 ??
#25 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#26 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#27 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#28 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall



----------- .xsession-errors (15 sec old) ---------------------
Loading socket FrontEnd module ...
Starting SCIM as daemon ...
Launching a SCIM process with x11...
Loading socket Config module ...
Creating backend ...
Loading x11 FrontEnd module ...
GTK Panel of SCIM 1.4.7
Starting SCIM as daemon ...
SCIM has been successfully launched.
Smart Common Input Method 1.4.7
** ERROR **: file nautilus-navigation-window.c: line 823 (activate_nth_short_list_item): assertion failed: (index < g_list_length (window->details->short_list_viewers))
aborting...
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Susana 2007-08-21 20:50:52 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 460524 ***