After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 466619 - crash in Tasks:
crash in Tasks:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 431396
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-08-14 14:35 UTC by rafael
Modified: 2007-09-04 23:19 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description rafael 2007-08-14 14:35:18 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.1-41.fc7 #1 SMP Fri Jul 27 18:10:34 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 150089728 vsize: 150089728 resident: 60497920 share: 41787392 rss: 60497920 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1187101847 rtime: 1885 utime: 1768 stime: 117 cutime:33 cstime: 16 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208887584 (LWP 12802)]
[New Thread -1294955632 (LWP 13167)]
[New Thread -1319543920 (LWP 13166)]
[New Thread -1262838896 (LWP 12926)]
[New Thread -1305445488 (LWP 12867)]
[New Thread -1226179696 (LWP 12825)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208887584 (LWP 12802))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_slice_free1
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_slist_free_1
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_slist_remove
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_object_run_dispose
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_widget_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 bonobo_ui_engine_prune_widget_info
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #25 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__POINTER
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #31 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #32 bonobo_ui_xml_rm
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #33 bonobo_ui_engine_xml_rm
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #34 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #35 _ORBIT_skel_small_Bonobo_UIContainer_removeNode
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #36 ORBit_c_stub_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #37 Bonobo_UIContainer_removeNode
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #38 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #39 bonobo_ui_component_rm
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #40 gal_view_menus_unmerge
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libmenus.so.0
  • #41 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libmenus.so.0
  • #42 g_object_unref
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #43 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #44 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #45 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #46 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #47 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #48 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #49 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #50 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #51 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #52 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #53 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #54 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (10 sec old) ---------------------
  Major opcode:  19
  Minor opcode:  0
  Resource id:  0x2607fc5
(evolution:12802): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_file_system_unix_get_parent: assertion `g_path_is_absolute (filename)' failed
(evolution:12802): e-utils-WARNING **: Cannot resolve symbol 'org_gnome_new_mail_config' in plugin '/usr/lib/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-new-mail-notify.so' (not exported?)
(evolution:12802): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xa488da0'
(evolution:12802): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xa488ec0'
X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) 8
  Major opcode:  158
  Minor opcode:  6
  Resource id:  0x65
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Tobias Mueller 2007-09-04 23:19:23 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 431396 ***