GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 464398
crash in Tasks:
Last modified: 2007-08-09 19:05:21 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Permissive Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks_Cairo-GNOME Icon Theme: Neu Memory status: size: 152551424 vsize: 152551424 resident: 45486080 share: 35622912 rss: 45486080 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1186500215 rtime: 443 utime: 345 stime: 98 cutime:2 cstime: 7 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208469792 (LWP 21224)] [New Thread -1304425584 (LWP 21299)] [New Thread -1283564656 (LWP 21257)] [New Thread -1230726256 (LWP 21251)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00d23991 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 153503
Thread 1 (Thread -1208469792 (LWP 21224))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". observer removed Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0". --------------------------------------------------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 464397 ***