GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 464087
crash in Tasks:
Last modified: 2007-09-21 13:04:05 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 178384896 vsize: 178384896 resident: 96395264 share: 43622400 rss: 96395264 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1186402557 rtime: 16981 utime: 14458 stime: 2523 cutime:49 cstime: 86 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208207648 (LWP 9329)] [New Thread -1241519216 (LWP 9391)] [New Thread -1272988784 (LWP 9389)] [New Thread -1231029360 (LWP 9365)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x0052f402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 153267
Thread 1 (Thread -1208207648 (LWP 9329))
----------- .xsession-errors (16127 sec old) --------------------- (gnome-background-properties:9607): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:9607): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_height: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:9607): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:9607): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:9607): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_height: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:9607): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:9607): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: asse ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 361462 ***