After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 462960 - crash in Sound Juicer CD Extractor:
crash in Sound Juicer CD Extractor:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 426935
Product: sound-juicer
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Sound Juicer Maintainers
Sound Juicer Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-08-03 01:37 UTC by tomatosukisukisuki
Modified: 2007-08-03 21:25 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description tomatosukisukisuki 2007-08-03 01:37:50 UTC
Version: 2.16.4

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.20-2925.13.fc7xen #1 SMP Tue Jul 17 10:38:27 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 137482240 vsize: 137482240 resident: 35201024 share: 23322624 rss: 35201024 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1186104034 rtime: 50896 utime: 48884 stime: 2012 cutime:3 cstime: 4 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/sound-juicer'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/nosegneg/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208404256 (LWP 18258)]
[New Thread -1295123568 (LWP 12883)]
[New Thread -1235223664 (LWP 20222)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00462402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208404256 (LWP 18258))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 gtk_list_store_set_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #5 gtk_list_store_set
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
  • #15 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0
  • #16 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gst_bus_async_signal_func
    from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0
  • #22 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #23 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #24 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (6 sec old) ---------------------
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libsepol.so.1" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libkeyutils.so.1" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Iestyn Pryce 2007-08-03 21:25:34 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 426935 ***