GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 457838
crash in Gimmie: Searching the "Linux" ta...
Last modified: 2007-09-11 18:27:13 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? Searching the "Linux" tab (applet) Distribution: Ubuntu 7.10 (gutsy) Gnome Release: 2.19.5 2007-07-11 (Ubuntu) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1 System: Linux 2.6.22-8-generic #1 SMP Thu Jul 12 16:09:47 GMT 2007 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Human Icon Theme: Human Memory status: size: 0 vsize: 0 resident: 0 share: 0 rss: 0 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 0 rtime: 0 utime: 0 stime: 0 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0 ----------- .xsession-errors (104 sec old) --------------------- to Wed Jul 18 00:00:01 2007 alarm-queue.c:479 (load_alarms) alarm-queue.c:498 (load_alarms) - Disevolution-alarm-notify-Message: alarm.c:235: Requested removal of nonexistent alarm! evolution-alarm-notify-Message: Setting timeout for 86400 1184817600 1184731200 evolution-alarm-notify-Message: Thu Jul 19 00:00:00 2007 evolution-alarm-notify-Message: Wed Jul 18 00:00:00 2007 checking for valid crashreport now checking for valid crashreport now Window manager warning: last_user_time (32) is greater than comparison timestamp (3615236063). This most likely represents a buggy client sending inaccurate timestamps in messages such as _NET_ACTIVE Window manager warning: 0x1000003 (Bottom Exp) appears to be one of the offending windows with a timestamp of 32. Working around... Window manager warning: last_user_time (32) is greater than comparison timestamp (3615241576). This most likely represents a buggy client sending inaccurate timestamps in messages such as _NET_ACTIVE Window manager warning: 0x1000003 (Bottom Exp) appears to be one of the offending windows with a timestamp of 32. Working around... -------------------------------------------------- Gimmie Version: 0.2.7 Traceback (most recent call last):
+ Trace 148746
printer.connect("attributes_changed", lambda p: self.emit("reload"))
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475020 ***