After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 457608 - crash in Tasks: Move the application on ...
crash in Tasks: Move the application on ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 444852
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-07-17 11:01 UTC by noordman
Modified: 2007-07-28 13:22 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description noordman 2007-07-17 11:01:30 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Move the application on the desktop


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 14:56:37 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 837259264 vsize: 837259264 resident: 112992256 share: 45477888 rss: 112992256 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1184666441 rtime: 4095 utime: 3335 stime: 760 cutime:47 cstime: 21 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912743871872 (LWP 3243)]
[New Thread 1147435344 (LWP 4210)]
[New Thread 1126189392 (LWP 4138)]
[New Thread 1136945488 (LWP 3323)]
[New Thread 1105209680 (LWP 3288)]
[New Thread 1094719824 (LWP 3287)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002aaaad8a497f in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread 46912743871872 (LWP 3243))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #4 g_hash_table_insert
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #5 gdk_pixmap_new
    from /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #6 gdk_window_begin_paint_region
    from /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #7 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #8 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 gdk_window_process_all_updates
    from /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #14 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib64/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #15 main
  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
(evolution:3243): e-data-server-ui-WARNING **: Sleutelbestand bevat geen groep ‘Passwords-Mail’
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Iestyn Pryce 2007-07-28 13:22:24 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 444852 ***