After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 455327 - crash in Epiphany Web Browser: trying to figure out why...
crash in Epiphany Web Browser: trying to figure out why...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 349051
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: General
2.14.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Marco Pesenti Gritti
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-07-09 22:34 UTC by cigtoxdoc
Modified: 2007-07-09 23:34 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description cigtoxdoc 2007-07-09 22:34:29 UTC
Version: 2.14.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
trying to figure out why synaptic won't load


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1

System: Linux 2.6.18-4-486 #1 Mon Mar 26 16:39:10 UTC 2007 i586
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 105508864 vsize: 105508864 resident: 42995712 share: 23339008 rss: 42995712 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1184011945 rtime: 173411 utime: 153951 stime: 19460 cutime:5 cstime: 2 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/epiphany'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1241769760 (LWP 6602)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xb6f50b11 in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread -1241769760 (LWP 6602))

  • #0 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 gtk_moz_embed_get_title
    from /usr/lib/libgtkembedmoz.so.0d
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #11 g_source_get_current_time
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 main
  • #0 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/lib/totem/libtotem-complex-plugin.so [/usr/lib/totem/libtotem-complex-plugin.so: undefined symbol: _ZN13nsTArray_base9sEmptyHdrE]
Window manager warning: last_user_time (3079025712) is greater than comparison timestamp (2904320496).  This most likely represents a buggy client sending inaccurate timestamps in messages such as _NE
Window manager warning: 0x2c00091 (Synaptic) appears to be one of the offending windows with a timestamp of 3079025712.  Working around...

(time-admin:9993): GnomeUI-WARNING **: While connecting to session manager:
Authentication Rejected, reason : None of the authentication protocols specified are supported and host-based authentication failed.
Window manager warning: last_user_time (3079742512) is greater than comparison timestamp (2904351801).  This most likely represents a buggy client sending inaccurate timestamps in messages such as _NE
Window manager warning: 0x2c00003 (Time and D) appears to be one of the offending windows with a timestamp of 3079742512.  Working around...
Failed to read a valid object file image from memory.
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-07-09 23:34:43 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 349051 ***