After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 453598 - crash in Main Menu:
crash in Main Menu:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 430074
Product: alacarte
Classification: Applications
Component: general
0.11.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Alacarte Maintainer(s)
Alacarte Maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-07-04 06:20 UTC by philippe.rouzet
Modified: 2007-07-04 12:55 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description philippe.rouzet 2007-07-04 06:20:51 UTC
Version: 0.11.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Permissive
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Glossy
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 54927360 vsize: 54927360 resident: 32186368 share: 21012480 rss: 32186368 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1183529771 rtime: 2127 utime: 2024 stime: 103 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/alacarte'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1209002304 (LWP 3979)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x008c0402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1209002304 (LWP 3979))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 gmenu_tree_ref
    from /usr/lib/libgnome-menu.so.2
  • #5 gmenu_tree_directory_get_tree
    from /usr/lib/libgnome-menu.so.2
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gmenu.so
  • #7 PyObject_GetAttr
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #8 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #9 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #10 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #11 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #12 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #14 PyObject_Call
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #15 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #16 PyObject_Call
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #17 PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #18 PyObject_CallObject
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #19 ??
    from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gobject/_gobject.so
  • #20 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_cell_renderer_activate
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #29 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #30 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #33 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #34 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #35 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #36 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #37 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #38 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #39 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #40 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #41 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #42 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #43 ??
    from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so
  • #44 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #45 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #46 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #47 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #48 PyEval_EvalCode
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #49 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #50 PyRun_FileExFlags
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #51 PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #52 PyRun_AnyFileExFlags
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #53 Py_Main
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #54 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (18 sec old) ---------------------
** Message: Could not connect to power manager: Could not get owner of name 'org.gnome.PowerManager': no such name
** Message: Could not connect to power manager: Could not get owner of name 'org.gnome.PowerManager': no such name
** Message: Found best visual for GL: 0x23
(gnome-about-me:3760): about-me-properties-WARNING **: e_book_get_self : il n'y avait pas d'UID d'auto-contact stockée dans GConf
(process:3915): GStreamer-WARNING **: The GStreamer function gst_init_get_option_group() was
	called, but the GLib threading system has not been initialised
	yet, something that must happen before any other GLib function
	is called. The application needs to be fixed so that it calls
	   if (!g_thread_supported ()) g_thread_init(NULL);
	as very first thing in its main() function. Please file a bug
	against this application.
"/usr/bin/alacarte": not in executable format: File format not recognized
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 palfrey 2007-07-04 12:55:11 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 430074 ***