After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 453164 - crash in Calendar: 1) read a memo 2) for ar...
crash in Calendar: 1) read a memo 2) for ar...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 224322
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Calendar
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-07-02 17:46 UTC by xinzhen
Modified: 2008-01-08 18:13 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description xinzhen 2007-07-02 17:46:19 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
1) read a memo
2) for around 1 minute
3) memo content disappears suddenly
4) click that memo again to try to bring it back
5) crash

Almost everytime I can reproduce this.


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: VistaBut
Icon Theme: Tango

Memory status: size: 208527360 vsize: 208527360 resident: 54992896 share: 43204608 rss: 54992896 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1183397125 rtime: 450 utime: 411 stime: 39 cutime:38 cstime: 13 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
`shared object read from target memory' has disappeared; keeping its symbols.
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208195360 (LWP 5087)]
[New Thread -1297089648 (LWP 5174)]
[New Thread -1446917232 (LWP 5173)]
[New Thread -1329620080 (LWP 5123)]
[New Thread -1308640368 (LWP 5117)]
0x00889402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 872
  • #3 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 408
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 ??
  • #6 html_object_is_container
    at htmlobject.c line 1329
  • #7 html_point_to_leaf
    at htmlinterval.c line 261
  • #8 html_interval_flat
    at htmlinterval.c line 283
  • #9 html_interval_unselect
    at htmlinterval.c line 184
  • #10 html_engine_redraw_selection
    at htmlengine.c line 6132
  • #11 html_engine_set_focus
    at htmlengine.c line 5198
  • #12 focus_in_event
    at gtkhtml.c line 1937
  • #13 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
    at gtkmarshalers.c line 84
  • #14 g_type_class_meta_marshal
    at gclosure.c line 567
  • #15 IA__g_closure_invoke
    at gclosure.c line 490
  • #16 signal_emit_unlocked_R
    at gsignal.c line 2478
  • #17 IA__g_signal_emit_valist
    at gsignal.c line 2209
  • #18 IA__g_signal_emit
    at gsignal.c line 2243
  • #19 gtk_widget_event_internal
    at gtkwidget.c line 3915
  • #20 do_focus_change
    at gtkwindow.c line 4782
  • #21 _gtk_window_set_is_active
    at gtkwindow.c line 7758
  • #22 gtk_window_focus_in_event
    at gtkwindow.c line 4804
  • #23 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
    at gtkmarshalers.c line 84
  • #24 g_type_class_meta_marshal
    at gclosure.c line 567
  • #25 IA__g_closure_invoke
    at gclosure.c line 490
  • #26 signal_emit_unlocked_R
    at gsignal.c line 2478
  • #27 IA__g_signal_emit_valist
    at gsignal.c line 2209
  • #28 IA__g_signal_emit
    at gsignal.c line 2243
  • #29 gtk_widget_event_internal
    at gtkwidget.c line 3915
  • #30 IA__gtk_main_do_event
    at gtkmain.c line 1553
  • #31 gdk_event_dispatch
    at gdkevents-x11.c line 2318
  • #32 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 2045
  • #33 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2677
  • #34 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2881
  • #35 bonobo_main
    at bonobo-main.c line 311
  • #36 main
    at main.c line 586

Thread 5 (Thread -1308640368 (LWP 5117)):
#-1 0x00889402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
No symbol table info available.

Thread 4 (Thread -1329620080 (LWP 5123)):
#-1 0x00889402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
No symbol table info available.

Thread 3 (Thread -1446917232 (LWP 5173)):
#-1 0x00889402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
No symbol table info available.

Thread 2 (Thread -1297089648 (LWP 5174)):
#-1 0x00889402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
No symbol table info available.

Thread 1 (Thread -1208195360 (LWP 5087)):
#-1 0x00889402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
No symbol table info available.


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
Variable "var_args" is not available.
Variable "is_active" is not available.
Variable "var_args" is not available.
Backtrace limit of 200 exceeded
Backtrace limit of 200 exceeded
Backtrace limit of 200 exceeded
Backtrace limit of 200 exceeded
Backtrace limit of 200 exceeded
Backtrace limit of 200 exceeded
Backtrace limit of 200 exceeded
Backtrace limit of 200 exceeded
Backtrace limit of 200 exceeded
Backtrace limit of 200 exceeded
Backtrace limit of 200 exceeded
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2007-07-02 19:24:52 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 224322 ***
Comment 2 Milan Crha 2008-01-08 18:13:25 UTC
Hello xinzhen, I would like to ask you if you are still able to reproduce this bug. I would like to reproduce it myself, but no luck, it works as expected. You wrote you can reproduce (even around half year ago), so I would like to ask you for a help, if you can, of course.

I guess you had there some text selected, in the memo preview, because without a selection it should work properly. Can you try if it depends on the part of selected text please? Or the way how you selected the text in preview? (like from top to bottom or opposite, or something.) You wrote above you clicked on the task again to see it, I guess you did it by mouse (hence the click word, right?) From the stack trace it seems that you placed focus back to preview.

(To be honest I'm not sure what to ask, so it seems a bit strange.)