After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 451336 - crash in Main Menu: Trying to remove the dir...
crash in Main Menu: Trying to remove the dir...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 451052
Product: alacarte
Classification: Applications
Component: general
0.11.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Alacarte Maintainer(s)
Alacarte Maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-06-26 18:10 UTC by linearfish
Modified: 2007-08-12 13:30 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description linearfish 2007-06-26 18:10:48 UTC
Version: 0.11.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Trying to remove the directory for wine


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 14:56:37 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 363315200 vsize: 363315200 resident: 34979840 share: 20369408 rss: 34979840 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1182881184 rtime: 144 utime: 129 stime: 15 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/alacarte'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912496209744 (LWP 29632)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0000003b5440d865 in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread 46912496209744 (LWP 29632))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 gmenu_tree_ref
    from /usr/lib64/libgnome-menu.so.2
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/gmenu.so
  • #5 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #6 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #7 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #8 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #9 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #11 PyObject_Call
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #13 PyObject_Call
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #14 PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #15 ??
    from /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gobject/_gobject.so
  • #16 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #30 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #31 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #32 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #33 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #34 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #35 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #36 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #37 ??
    from /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so
  • #38 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #39 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #40 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #41 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #42 PyEval_EvalCode
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #43 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #44 PyRun_FileExFlags
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #45 PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #46 Py_Main
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #47 __libc_start_main
    from /lib64/libc.so.6
  • #48 _start
  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
    item_id = os.path.split(items[iter][3].get_desktop_file_path())[1]
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/posixpath.py", line 77, in split
    i = p.rfind('/') + 1
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Alacarte/MainWindow.py", line 417, in on_item_tree_show_toggled
    self.editor.setVisible(item, False)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Alacarte/MenuEditor.py", line 205, in setVisible
    self.__addUndo([self.__getMenu(item), item])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Alacarte/MenuEditor.py", line 404, in __addUndo
    file_path = os.path.join(util.getUserDirectoryPath(), os.path.split(item.get_desktop_file_path())[1])
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/posixpath.py", line 77, in split
    i = p.rfind('/') + 1
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind'
"/usr/bin/alacarte": not in executable format: File format not recognized
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 palfrey 2007-06-27 13:29:35 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 451052 ***
Comment 2 Philip Withnall 2007-08-12 13:30:20 UTC
*** Bug 465529 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***