GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 449428
crash in Panel: During booting.
Last modified: 2007-06-20 20:28:18 UTC
Version: 2.18.2 What were you doing when the application crashed? During booting. Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 56000512 vsize: 56000512 resident: 28950528 share: 23404544 rss: 28950528 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1182336950 rtime: 85 utime: 72 stime: 13 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-panel' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208531232 (LWP 3755)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00735402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 142385
Thread 1 (Thread -1208531232 (LWP 3755))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- ** Message: volume = 0 ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 (gnome-panel:3755): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (gnome-panel:3755): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_unref: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed (gnome-panel:3755): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_unref: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed (gnome-panel:3755): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_unref: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed (gnome-panel:3755): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_unref: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 446183 ***